Contract Information Class 1 | |
| Reference Number | 1886 |
| Amount Payable | Greater than $150,000.00 Estimated up to $2 Million over five years pending application volume |
| Effective Date | 06/02/2026 |
| Completion Date | 05/02/2031 |
| Name and business address of the contractor |
LEARNING INFORMATION SYSTEMS PTY LIMITED T/A STUDYLINK - Suite 1, Level 11, 66 Goulburn Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
|
| Particulars of the project to be undertaken, the goods or services to be provided or real property to be leased/transferred | Access, use and configuration of the SaaS Study Link Admission Solution for the purpose of processing applications for admissions to onshore programs |
| Details of any related body corporate or private sector entity who will be involved in carrying out any of the contractor’s obligations or receive a benefit. | |
| Are there any provisions under which the amount payable may be varied? | Yes |
| Amount Payable Variation Clauses | Additional work orders can be raised, volume of application are reconciled throughout contract period. Details available in Fee Schedule |
| Can the contract be renegotiated? | Yes |
| Renegotiation Clauses | Elements of the contract could be adjusted through negotiation but this would be documented and required to go through university governance processes |
| Did the contract involve a tender process? | No |
| Description of any provisions under which the contractor is to receive payment for providing operational or maintenance services | This is a SaaS agreement so technical maintenance (patching, updates etc) are included in the scope of the contract |
Contract Information Class 2 | |
| Is there a transfer of significant assets to the State? | No |
| Is there a transfer of significant assets to the contractor? | No |
| Has any cost-benefit analysis been undertaken by UOW? | Yes |
| Cost Benefit Analysis Results | The project was established following extensive feedback from international education agents of challenges in submitting applications via existing systems |
| Was a public sector comparator used? | No |
| Did the contractor provide a base case financial model? | No |
| If relevant, provide details of how risk is to be apportioned between the parties. | Via contract terms which have been accepted by the University |
| Have there been any significant guarantees or undertakings between the parties? | No |
| Other Key Elements | N/A |



